Mar 31, 2009

Public Education

Here's a list of false associations that schools imprint into students' minds about studying:
* SCHOOL: "If I want to learn about something, I should attend to school/college/university."
Wrong. I can easily learn things on my own by reading books, watching video tutorials, modeling, and practicing. Educational institutes create the illusion of a professional environment, but trust me: you can easily learn everything on your own, without being pressured by rules and authority.

* OBLIGATION: "I must study or else I'll be punished."
Not true. Education is a choice. Because schools make it obligatory to attend, one can be left with the impression that education as a whole is a must. You get scolded when you're absent, you get shamed for low grades. It's like a prison you get sent to, but you have to realize that education itself is not imprisonment, but rather liberation.

* CHORES: "Although studying is not a pleasant task, I should get it done for my own good."
Not really. I find it pleasant to learn about things I'm curious about. Schools make it seem like a chore because they make you study shit you don't necessarily care about. They make you compromise for the sake of good grades, or else you get punished.

* OBEYING AUTHORITY: "I should study because that's what teachers and parents tell me to do."
Wrong. Studying is not about following orders, it's about advancing my knowledge. Educational institutes promote ranks and hierarchy. If you refuse to obey, you get scolded and punished. But fuck what your parents and teachers say. They don't care about your intellectual development, all they wanna do is be in control and look important. You're the only one responsible for your education, so forget this bullshit.

* COMPETITION: "I should study because I shouldn't stay behind."
Absolutely not. I'm free to take as much time as I need to fully understand the lessons. Grades create the impression that education is some sort of a game where one wins or loses. Grades pressure students to rush things and compare each other hierarchically. There are no grades in real life.

* RESPECT: "I should study if I respect my teachers/parents."
Not true. Showing respect has nothing to do with advancing my knowledge. To say the least, if you study a subject that you're interested in, you respect yourself, not anybody else. Teachers and parents create the impression that if you don't do well in school, you're being disrespectful. Horseshit.

* BEING MORAL: "I'm a bad person if I don't want to study."
Wrong. Not being motivated means I have no clear interest in the subject. It has nothing to do with morality. Knowledge can make you a better person, but not necessarily. Resisting boring information, resisting to obey authority, and resisting to attend, have NOTHING to do with being a good person.

* SOCIAL STATUS: "I should study or else I'm a loser." or "I'm a loser if I study too much."
No. There are no winners and losers. This is not a game, it's just a process. Students resent good achievers because good achievers at school are often also good slaves and asskissers. In real life, that is not really the case, as intelligent people are not followers, but rather leaders.
They give you high grades in school for obeying the teachers and kissing their asses. Parents give you love for being a good student, and not just for being their child. So education here becomes a manipulative tool for control. It's not the education of the student that matters, but rather how they can be exploited. Most teachers don't really care if their students learn anything - they get paid nonetheless, and their excuse is that the students are lazy. So in this system, everyone is doing something for all the wrong reasons. The incentives are totally twisted and bizarre. Students end up procrastinating, because their motivation has been murdered. School is a form of imprisonment: it limits your freedom and it scars you for life.

Studying is really just the process of learning something new. Nothing more, nothing less. People learn all the time without even realizing it. They think they're having fun when they're playing a new game, and guess what: they have to learn the game. They have to study the whole thing in order to become skillful and beat it. Etc. In order to take advantage of college, have this in mind: you are in this class because you demand guidance and help with the subject that you wish to learn. You are in this class for knowledge, not for grades. You are in this class because you chose to, and you DON'T have to comply with anything that you dislike about it, including the teacher's instructions. This class is NOT a game, and there are no winners and losers - the school grades are fatuous - they are NOT an indicator of your intellect, and they are NOT an indicator of your worthiness.

Mar 21, 2009

Gaysbook & Privacy

I did some research on why Gaysbook is so popular. Turns out that one of the gentlemen who created facebook.com, Chris Hughes, now works for Barack Obama, and primarily acts as the coordinator of online organizing at my.BarackObama.com - the campaign's online social networking website. The COO of facebook.com, Sheryl Sandberg, was hired to handle facebook's sales, marketing, business development, human resources, public policy, privacy issues and communications. Before that, she was Google's sales head, and prior to that, she was chief of staff to U.S. Treasury Secretary Larry Summers in the Clinton administration. Why the sudden popularity of facebook.com? You make your own conclusions.

On a sidenote, Gaysbook can get you killed, if you're stupid enough to publicly expose your privacy: In December 2006, campus police at the University of North Carolina at Wilmington were investigating the theft of two PlayStation consoles, which had been stolen by the two perpetrators of a beating and robbery on campus. They planned to raid the rented house of Peyton Strickland, an 18-year-old student at nearby Cape Fear Community College. They discovered that the other alleged robber, Ryan Mills, had posted photographs of himself on Facebook in which he posed with guns. Expecting "heavily armed resistance" at Strickland's house, the officers called in a SWAT team for backup to raid Strickland's house. When they arrived at the residence, which three students rented, they were not immediately let in. As one officer began to break down the door with a battering ram, another officer mistook the sound of the battering ram for gunshots and shot into the door, killing the unarmed Strickland. The officer, Christopher Long, was not charged with second-degree murder by two different grand juries.

So remember kids, by registering an account at Gaysbook, you are feeding the Beast information about you and your friends. Everything that you publish on the internet can and will be used against you.

Big Brother is watching you.

Mar 20, 2009

Stephen Colbert Sucks

Here's a list of 10 unfunny people funnier than Stephen Colbert:
1. Bill O'Reilly
2. Ben Stiller
3. Jacky Chan
4. Dane Cook
5. Jeff Dunham
6. Ray Romano
7. D. L. Hughley
8. David Alan Grier
9. Carlos Mencia
10. Zach Braff
Most of the Colbert Report is just filler, including the cheers and applause. The rest is shit I can't relate to. I mean, sure, it's a lot of fun mocking bigotry, but it's also very hypocritical. I mean, if you really hate the fact that ignorant people can vote and become politicians, the solution is definitely not making them look cute and funny with your comedy. There are already too many real bigots, and acting like one, just for laughs, is just an act of passive aggressiveness. In this case, laughter is just a defensive mechanism; the joy of the slave. People get to feel morally superior, big deal. What's the recipe for NOT FUNNY? Take satire and mix it up with politics. Let's not blame it all on Stephen. His screenwriters are stuck with the same template and nothing new ever comes out of their asses. And now, get ready for... TONIGHT'S WORD: *applause and cheering, vocal chords torn apart*



Here's a list of 10 unfunny things funnier than the Colbert Report:
1. Fart jokes
2. Dirty pun jokes
3. "Your mom" jokes
4. "What's with that?" jokes
5. Slapstick comedy
6. Celebrity anecdotes
7. Played out memes
8. Sitcoms (Friends, That 70's Show)
9. "Here's your sign" jokes
10. Comedic relief in Star Wars


This is what the Colbert Report writers would've come up with if they had to bash their own show. It's always "hilarious" to paste Stephen's face on a picture. Fuck this guy. He should either quit or demand that they hire new writers. I admit the show used to be funny, back when it wasn't just a pleaser for smug socialist snobs. I used to like Stephen's interviews, most of all. If you like shit like that, check out Zach Galifianakis and his show Between Two Ferns; he's the real deal. I hate Stephen Colbert is just a clown that I hate.